Fair Use AbuseImage Search EnginesAboutTerms
Kelly v Arriba SoftKelly v Brown
NetCopyRightLaw.com

Amish.Net





Kelly v Hartford Insurance

Huntington Beach, CA, Tuesday, June 15, 2004 Leslie A. Kelly announced today that Steven L. Krongold, Esq., BIENERT & KRONGOLD, San Clemente, CA has filed a lawsuit against THE HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY in the California Superior Court, County of Orange, Central Justice Center, Santa Ana, CA. The complaint, COMPLAINT FOR ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT AGAINST INSURER UNDER INSURANCE CODE, §11580; BREACH OF CONTRACT; BREACH OF IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD-FAITH AND FAIR-DEALING; AND DECLARATORY RELIEF, was filed based on Hartford's refusal to pay a Judgment awarded to Kelly in the amount $345,000 plus legal expense. It is summarized as follows:

"This is a direct action by an injured third-party against an insurer to collect a judgment covered by a liability policy issued in the State of California. The defendant insurer refuses to pay the judgement based, in part, on a release entered into with the original torfeasor/insured without notice to or consent of the plaintiff. California law makes such release agreements unenforceable as against the claimant who is considered a third-party beneficiary of the insurance policy. Since the policy covers the claim, defendant should be ordered to satisfy the judgment in full, plus accrued interest and reasonable attorney's fees."

Kelly allges, among other things, "On or about May 17, 2004, and continuing thereafter, HARTFORD further breached the implied covenant of good-faith and fair-dealing by asserting coverage defenses in bad-faith and for an improper purpose to deny Kelly the benefits of the Policy, to wit, payment of his Judgment."

Kelly further alleges, "Kelly is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the aforementioned acts of defendant HARTFORD were done willfully, maliciously, with fraudulent intent and with deliberate disregard of the rights, privilege and concerns of Kelly. Kelly is thus entitled to recover punitive damages in an amount bearing a reasonable relationship both to the actual amount of damages Kelly recovers and the general financial solvency of defendant yet in a sufficient amount to punish and make an example of defendant and to deter others from engaging in the same or similar conduct. ... "

Kelly's complaint has been assigned Case No. 04CC06714 and will be presided over by Judge James M. Brooks, Dept. C12

Back to top

Home | Kelly v Does | Kelly v FJ Designs | Yoder v FJ Designs | Yoder v Green
Consulting Services | © Resources | Fair Use Abuse | Image Search Engines | About
Kelly v Arriba Soft | Kelly v Brown | Settlements | Outstanding Issues

Copyright ©1999-2007 NetCopyrightLaw Net Consulting Services
Contact Us | Terms of Use
Web Hosting by American Web Services | Content Management System by ArrowClick